Valsts valodas centra izstrādātie politikas, tiesību un valsts pārvaldes termini

Konteksts: [..] In this connection, the Court reiterates that, "having regard to the fact that the Convention is a 'living instrument which must be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions'" (see the following judgments: Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, pp. 15-16, § 31; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 40, § 102; and Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310, pp. 26-27, § 71), it has held: " certain acts which were classified in the past as 'inhuman and degrading treatment' as opposed to 'torture' could be classified differently in future. [..]
Avots: Case of Hénaf v. France (Application no. 65436/01, European Court of Human Rights Judgment of 27 November 2003)